<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>china &#8211; Gig City Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gigcitygeek.com/tag/china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gigcitygeek.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>AI Regulation: White House Moves to Control the Future</title>
		<link>https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/24/white-house-ai-regulation-national-framework/</link>
					<comments>https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/24/white-house-ai-regulation-national-framework/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial-intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://GigCityGeek.com/?p=3309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The White House is codifying a national AI framework, aiming for US dominance.  President Trump’s order preempted state laws, sparking debate over innovati...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the anxiety that people that are in DC, that think the &#8216;<a title="Series of tubes - Wikipedia" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series<em>of</em>tubes&#8221; target=&#8221;<em>blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener&#8221;>Internet is tubes</a>&#8216;, aim to try to regulate it. That creeping sense that technology is moving faster than they can understand, let alone control. My son, the high-spec gamer, is constantly rattling off specs I can’t even pronounce, while my wife just wants the streaming to work without buffering by the pool. Now, the <a title="The Legislative Branch - The White House" href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/government/legislative-branch/" target="</em>blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener&#8221;>White House</a> is stepping in, attempting to set the rules of the game for Artificial Intelligence, and it’s a move that could fundamentally reshape how we live and work.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t just about algorithms; it&#8217;s about who gets to decide the future.</p>
<p><h4>The Great Preemption</h4>
</p>
<p>The core of this whole thing is a power play. President Trump’s <a title="What Is an Executive Order? - American Bar Association" href="https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public<em>education/publications/teaching-legal-docs/what-is-an-executive-order-/&#8221; target=&#8221;</em>blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener&#8221;>Executive Order</a>, signed last year, effectively told states to back off any AI regulations they were trying to implement. Now, the White House is codifying that with a national framework, aiming to create a uniform approach across the country. This is about preventing a chaotic <a title="The Patchwork of Data Privacy Laws: Recent Developments and ..." href="https://www.shumaker.com/insight/the-patchwork-of-data-privacy-laws-recent-developments-and-implications/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Patchwork</a> of laws that could stifle innovation, or so they claim. It’s a bold move, and one that’s already drawing fire.</p>
<p><h4>The &#8220;Light Touch&#8221; Approach</h4>
</p>
<p>The administration’s stated goal is to foster American dominance in the AI race, particularly against China. They want to unleash &#8220;American ingenuity&#8221; and create a regulatory environment that encourages rapid development. The framework outlines six objectives for Congress, covering everything from data center permits to combating AI-enabled scams.</p>
<p>It’s a broad sweep, and it’s clear they’re prioritizing growth above all else.</p>
<p><h4>The Fine Print: Who Benefits?</h4>
</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be honest, this isn&#8217;t about protecting the average user. The real winners here are the tech giants, the ones already pouring billions into AI development. They’ve been lobbying for a federal framework precisely because state-level regulations threatened their bottom lines. My wife, bless her heart, doesn&#8217;t care about the nuances of regulatory policy or politics, but she <em>does</em> care when her smart fridge decides to order her 17 pounds of kale. This framework might just make those kinds of annoyances more common.</p>
<p><em>The administration is proposing what it says is an approach to balance enforcing intellectual property rights with the need to train AI models using real-world content.</em></p>
<p><h4>The Critics Are Loud</h4>
</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t going unchallenged. Groups like The Alliance for Secure AI are raising serious concerns that the framework lacks accountability and could leave consumers vulnerable to AI-driven harms. One critic, Brad Carson, compared the plan to social media regulation – a low bar, considering the mess that’s become.</p>
<p>He called it &#8220;<a title="A.Word.A.Day --saccharine - Wordsmith" href="https://wordsmith.org/words/saccharine.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">saccharine</a>: empty of nutrition, certain to leave a bitter aftertaste, and probably carcinogenic.&#8221; That’s… a strong take.</p>
<p><h4>The Midterm Hurdle</h4>
</p>
<p>Even with the White House pushing hard, getting this framework turned into actual <a title="Legislative Process: United States: Bill to Law - Gallagher Law Library" href="https://lib.law.uw.edu/legproc" target="<em>blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener&#8221;>legislation</a> will be an uphill battle. The <a title="2026 midterm elections calendar | AP News" href="https://apnews.com/projects/elections-2026/calendar/" target="</em>blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;noopener&#8221;>Midterm elections</a> loom, and the political landscape is already fraught with tension. It&#8217;s a gamble, and whether it pays off remains to be seen.</p>
<p><em>The White House said they’ll work with Congress in the coming months “to turn this framework into legislation that the President can sign,” though many in the <a title="What is AI Policy ? Key Components - Centraleyes" href="https://www.centraleyes.com/glossary/ai-policy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AI policy</a> space believe it will be difficult to pass any legislation before the midterm elections in November.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/24/white-house-ai-regulation-national-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
