<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>import ban &#8211; Gig City Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gigcitygeek.com/tag/import-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gigcitygeek.com</link>
	<description>Gig powered, curiosity driven...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>FCC Router Ban: Made in USA Requirement Explained</title>
		<link>https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/25/fcc-router-ban-made-in-usa/</link>
					<comments>https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/25/fcc-router-ban-made-in-usa/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Made in USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national-security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[router]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://GigCityGeek.com/?p=3322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The FCC just banned router imports not made in the U.S., citing national security concerns and potential cyberattack vulnerabilities. Learn about the new 'Ma...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have the family screaming about lag, and you’re staring at a blinking light wondering if you should just chuck the <a title="What Is a Router and How It Works: Your Ultimate Guide | TP-Link Philippines" href="https://www.tp-link.com/ph/blog/2342/what-is-a-router-and-how-it-works-your-ultimate-guide/" target="&lt;em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">Router</a> out the window. It’s a modern frustration, a digital migraine. But now, thanks to the <a title="What We Do | Federal Communications Commission" href="https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/what-we-do" target="&lt;/em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">FCC</a>, that frustration might be accompanied by a little bit of…national pride?</p>
<p>Or at least, a whole lot of manufacturing shifts. The FCC just dropped a bomb – a digital one – essentially banning the import of new routers <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fcc-foreign-router-ban-national-security-technology-7e5333aeaf82496ce6350f57699db5ba">that aren’t made in the U.S</a>. Existing routers are fine, but anything new hitting the market has to be stamped “Made in America.”</p>
<p>This isn’t some subtle tweak; it’s a full-on pivot, and it’s got a national security justification that sounds straight out of a spy thriller.</p>
<p><h4>The National Security Angle? Seriously?</h4>
</p>
<p>Apparently, those routers we’ve been happily plugging into our walls are also potential backdoors for <a title="Types of Cyber Attacks Explained (2026 Guide)" href="https://www.techprescient.com/blogs/types-of-cyber-attacks/" target="&lt;em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">Cyberattacks</a>. The FCC is citing a &#8220;<a title="FCC Updates Covered List Based on DoW National Security ..." href="https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2026/01/alerts-otherindustries-fcc-updates-covered-list-based-on-dow" target="&lt;/em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">National Security Determination</a>&#8221; – a fancy way of saying &#8220;we&#8217;re worried about hackers.&#8221; They’re pointing fingers at vulnerabilities exploited in past attacks, like the <a title="Salt Typhoon Attacks Data Breach - Huntress" href="https://www.huntress.com/threat-library/data-breach/salt-typhoon-attacks-data-breach" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Salt Typhoon</a> incident, suggesting foreign-made routers could be used to compromise American infrastructure. It’s a bit dramatic, sure, but the concern is that these devices could be leveraged to attack civilians directly.</p>
<p>My son, the high-spec gamer, would probably roll his eyes at this. He’s more concerned with his <a title="A Guide to What Ping Means in Gaming &amp; What Affects It&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;– Apex Gaming PCs" href="https://apexgamingpcs.com/en-de/blogs/apex-support/what-is-ping-gaming" target="&lt;em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">ping times</a> than geopolitical espionage.</p>
<p><h4>Supply Chain Shenanigans</h4>
</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time the government has taken a hard line on foreign tech. Remember the <a title="The U.S. Government Just Followed Through on Its Ban of DJI ..." href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/u-government-just-followed-ban-222800655.html" target="&lt;/em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">drone debacle</a>? This is bigger, though. Routers are everything these days. The shift in manufacturing will be massive, especially since most consumer routers currently come from places like Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Trump-era trade wars already started moving production, but this FCC ruling is accelerating the process. Companies now have to disclose their entire supply chain and detail plans to manufacture routers in the U.S. to get that &#8220;<a title="FAQs on Recent Updates to FCC Covered List Regarding ..." href="https://www.fcc.gov/faqs-recent-updates-fcc-covered-list-regarding-routers-produced-foreign-countries" target="&lt;em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">Conditional Approval</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good luck with that paperwork. It’s going to be interesting to see how quickly companies can actually retool and move production.</p>
<p><h4>The Fine Print &amp; Future Fallout</h4>
</p>
<p>The FCC keeps a &#8220;<a title="FCC Council on National Security: One Year In" href="https://www.fcc.gov/news-events/blog/2026/03/16/fcc-council-national-security-one-year" target="&lt;/em&gt;blank" rel="noopener">Covered List</a>&#8221; of tech that poses a national security risk. Routers are now on it. FCC Chief <a title="Brendan Carr - Federal Communications Commission" href="https://www.fcc.gov/about/leadership/brendan-carr" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Brendan Carr</a> is practically doing a victory lap, praising President Trump’s “leadership” and promising to keep American cyberspace “safe and secure.”</p>
<p>It’s a bit of a political statement wrapped in a technical announcement, isn’t it? The real question is: will this actually make us safer, or just make routers more expensive? This move is a big deal, and it&#8217;s going to ripple through the tech world.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bold move, Cotton, let&#8217;s see if it pays off. It’s a bit dramatic, sure, but the concern is that these devices could be leveraged to compromise American infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gigcitygeek.com/2026/03/25/fcc-router-ban-made-in-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
